Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
1. Announcement:UNSCHEDULED SERVER DOWNTIME - 2016-03-27 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Falcon I feel bad for you and the CCP Server bros... props for always being there for the community.
- by Kassasis Dakkstromri - at 2016.03.27 11:00:38
|
2. Wyld for CSM - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
Come take a vote on the Wyld side. Vote Wyld for CSM.
- by Kassasis Dakkstromri - at 2016.03.27 10:46:18
|
3. Server downtime and Dayligth saving hour - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Well someone is observing something... like perhaps a power cable they tripped over and killed the client login server?? Getting "Handshake Failed - Server Failed"
- by Kassasis Dakkstromri - at 2016.03.27 10:15:37
|
4. Sticky:Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: And thus it begins! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Now that the new grids are implemented, it stands to reason that someone ask about the new fighter mechanic; specifically whether or not there will be any changes to the speed stats of fighters (and fighter bombers), or if we should expect them to...
- by Kassasis Dakkstromri - at 2015.12.10 01:18:40
|
5. Sticky:Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: And thus it begins! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
New Shield and Armor Optimal/ Falloff graph being reported: Capital Remote Shield Repair Optimal and Fall Off Graph (WIP) Also the new RR Capital Modules are being reported on SiSi currently.
- by Kassasis Dakkstromri - at 2015.11.26 21:19:11
|
6. Sticky:Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: And thus it begins! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Rowells wrote: Have we confirmed the HAWB for caldari caps uses missiles still? I don't see why it wouldn't but I want to double check. I asked this question, and we as of yet have not received a formal response from the Devs.
- by Kassasis Dakkstromri - at 2015.11.26 21:16:39
|
7. Sticky:Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: And thus it begins! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I haven't seen this asked yet... Will Dreadnaughts receive updated hull designs, from the art department, to show a docking bay (for their new Ship Maintenance Bay)?
- by Kassasis Dakkstromri - at 2015.11.19 18:00:25
|
8. Sticky:Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: And thus it begins! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Buying a fully fit Carrier in Null Sec 'could' run around 2.5B ISK depending on the builder and how he/she sets their pricing. I know that for us, one of our builders charges 2.2B ISK for fully fit with drones/fighters. The thought comes to mind ...
- by Kassasis Dakkstromri - at 2015.11.08 16:19:27
|
9. Sticky:Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: And thus it begins! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sgt Ocker wrote: CCP don't really pay attention ... CSM please fix this. I mean has anyone in Team Five-0 actually played Capital Ships, besides ejecting from a Polaris and boarding one for ship spinning?
- by Kassasis Dakkstromri - at 2015.11.06 23:45:41
|
10. Sticky:Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: And thus it begins! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
afkalt wrote: How can people not get this? The problem isn't N+1 per-se, the problem is that at a sufficient level of n+1, the opponent is literally unable to kill a single thing. N+1 isn't going anywhere, what is getting tossed under the b...
- by Kassasis Dakkstromri - at 2015.11.06 18:51:32
|
11. Sticky:Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: And thus it begins! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Still waiting for replies from CCP to any critic thus far... In the mean time: Should we expect the new Chimera hull design early or released with Citadel Expansion Man I really want that new hull.
- by Kassasis Dakkstromri - at 2015.11.06 02:52:33
|
12. Sticky:Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: And thus it begins! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
If others have had success in using Void Bombs, then that's wonderful, and if nothing else a buff even a insignificant one that gets Void Bombs listed on the patch notes can draw attention to them. And hopefully more groups will start to use this ...
- by Kassasis Dakkstromri - at 2015.11.03 15:01:37
|
13. Sticky:Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: And thus it begins! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Trinkets friend wrote: You obviously missed the bit where there's now anti-capital Void Bombs. And, you know, actual normal Void Bombs. If your referring to the Focused Void Bomb, it has a 5000m effect radius/range, but does nothing to inte...
- by Kassasis Dakkstromri - at 2015.11.03 02:31:15
|
14. Sticky:Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: And thus it begins! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Alavaria Fera wrote: Querns wrote: However, thanks to external, anonymous forms of PVE, a "blow-off valve" definitely exists to allow an organization to scale to any size. Frankly, Goonswarm Federation and the rest of the Imperium ...
- by Kassasis Dakkstromri - at 2015.11.02 17:26:09
|
15. Sticky:Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: And thus it begins! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
FT Diomedes wrote: Kassasis Dakkstromri wrote: Force Aux. are even worse than current Triage due to the lack of damage projection abilities. Triage Carriers do not project any damage in Triage mode. Most Triage Carriers carry only a sm...
- by Kassasis Dakkstromri - at 2015.11.01 21:14:03
|
16. Sticky:Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: And thus it begins! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
FT Diomedes wrote: Querns wrote: It's adorable that you keep trying to salvage the jack-of-all-trades contemporary carrier mechanics, when they're the single best tool that the "blob" has. I'll confess that this is the single most baffli...
- by Kassasis Dakkstromri - at 2015.11.01 19:55:00
|
17. Sticky:Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: And thus it begins! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
In regards to the new FAX Capital: "Easily Destroyable" does not equal 'Disposable'. The FAX will more than likely cost the same as a current carrier as regard build costs, if not more. Putting the price anywhere as low as 750M ISK to as potentia...
- by Kassasis Dakkstromri - at 2015.11.01 00:33:02
|
18. Sticky:Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: And thus it begins! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Will the new Force Auxiliary have a visibly cool fancy 'transformation' like T3 Destroyers for when it goes in and out of Triage, etc.? I can't believe I had forgotten to ask about this.
- by Kassasis Dakkstromri - at 2015.10.31 04:43:30
|
19. Sticky:Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: And thus it begins! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sgt Ocker wrote: Querns wrote: Kassasis Dakkstromri wrote: In my estimation, having ships that are only 'temporarily' valuable and as such disposable, is not good for EVE as a game nor for the players - players who one day might get to jo...
- by Kassasis Dakkstromri - at 2015.10.31 04:41:06
|
20. Sticky:Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: And thus it begins! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Rowells wrote: So, how effective will HAWB be at reprocessing packs of cruisers? If I'm translating this right: HAWB = High Angle Weapons Battery, then iirc it will only be effective against Battleships, and 'maybe' highly target painted Cr...
- by Kassasis Dakkstromri - at 2015.10.31 03:35:03
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |